Working Mothers: Maternity Rights under Hong Kong Law

New Mothers have many things to worry about. Those who are working can also face additional problems in terms of maternity rights and difficulties when returning to work. The law provides several protections for working mothers in such situations.

Maternity Rights

Under Hong Kong Law a pregnant woman is entitled to maternity benefits from her employer, provided she is employed under a “continuous contract”. That requires employment of over 18 hours per week. The maternity benefits include:

1. Maternity leave of:

  • 10 weeks leave;
  • An additional time equivalent to the period between the expected date of birth and the actual date of birth; and
  • Up to 4 weeks additional leave in the event of illness or disability related to the birth or pregnancy. This is in addition to the entitlement to sick leave.

The 10 weeks leave would start 4 weeks before the expected date of birth, unless the employer and employee can agree a date, which would usually be between 4 and 2 weeks before the birth. If the baby is born early, and prior to the agreed commencement date, the 10 week maternity period will start on the date of the birth.

The pregnant employee will need to have given notice of her pregnancy and intention to take maternity leave to the employer.

2. If the woman has been employed for over 40 weeks and has given the employer a certificate of pregnancy and of the expected due date, she is also entitled to maternity pay. This is payable for the 10 week period. The pay is at a rate of 4/5ths of the employee’s usual wage.

3. A valuable protection is the prohibition on termination of employment. Unless the employee is summarily dismissed for gross misconduct, the employer is barred from terminating the employment of an employee who has given notice of her pregnancy.
Under Hong Kong law it does not matter whether the reason for the dismissal is linked to the pregnancy or not. The prohibition is absolute. Indeed, even if the employer is unaware of the pregnancy and gives notice, the employer must withdraw the notice if the employee gives immediate notice of the pregnancy.

If the employer terminates the employment in breach of this law, then they must pay the employee all of her wages and maternity pay up to the date on which the maternity leave would have ended. In addition the employer commits a criminal offence and is liable for the following additional sums:

  • An additional month’s wages; and
  • For employees with over 2 years of service, they may also be entitled to additional benefits of up to $150,000.

4. A pregnant employee who has given a medical certificate cannot be assigned to perform hazardous and strenuous work which may cause a risk to the pregnancy. If her job involves that type of work, then the employer must change the employee’s duties within 14 days of the certificate being presented.

Pregnant women who wish to utilise these rights need to make sure that the proper notices are served and also that their employers are aware of these rights. It is possible for employers to agree more generous maternity rights and even include these in the employment contract. Indeed many employers, especially international firms, have consistent maternity benefits irrespective of the location and the local law, with many employers offering maternity leave of 6 months or more. However, in the absence of agreement the only entitlement is to the benefits and rights set out previously.

Part Time Working

As mentioned above, to take advantage of the maternity benefits under the Employment ordinance an employee must be employed under a “continuous contract”.

However it is not only the maternity rights which are dependant upon this. Many of the rights under the employment Ordinance are dependant upon the employee qualifying for those rights by having a “continuous contract”.

In effect this requires employees to work over 18 hours every week. Many mothers returning to work may wish to change their working hours and work part time or on some other schedule, such as alternate weeks or some other “job-share” arrangement. The employee must ensure that she meets the requirement of 18 hours every week in order to qualify for many of the protections under the Employment Ordinance. If she does not the employee will often fail to qualify as being employed under a continuous contract and will lose much of the protection under the Employment Ordinance, including to:

  • Sickness leave and sick pay;
  • Statutory Paid leave;
  • Employment Protection; and
  • Severance and Long service Pay.

Mothers returning to work on changed hours and working arrangements should take care to make sure that they are not inadvertently waiving many of their statutory rights.


Many mothers returning to work also face the risk of discrimination against them by their employers. This may be for many reasons such as resentment at the claiming of maternity benefits, a perceived reduction in commitment or flexibility, or a preference for a temporary replacement who performed the job while the employee was on maternity leave.

However, no matter what the reason the law provides protection against discrimination on the grounds of sex, pregnancy and family status. Employers are not entitled to discriminate against employees on the grounds of their pregnancy or sex or family status or treat them less favourably than the employer would treat someone who was not in the same position.

Forms of discrimination include termination, other detriment and the denial of opportunities which would have been available but for the discrimination, as well as direct discrimination where the employer deliberately places an employee at a disadvantage because of their sex, or pregnancy. The law also prohibits indirect discrimination.

Therefore if an employer, for example, treats the part-time employees less favourably, this may have the indirect effect of discriminating against women and mothers if the majority of part–time workers are in that category.

A good example of discrimination is the recent case of Lam Wing Lai vs Y.T. Cheng (Chingtai) Limited on 23rd December 2005. In that case a secretary to the Directors went on maternity leave. She had also had several periods of Sick Leave due to pregnancy complications. She was replaced during her maternity leave by a temporary secretary.

On returning to work, she suspected her employers wished to terminate her employment and she enquired as to their intentions. After a short period they made allegations of poor performance and terminated her employment. The Court reviewed the evidence and decided that one of the reasons for the dismissal was discrimination on the grounds of her pregnancy, sex and family status.

The employee was awarded compensation for loss of income and injury to feelings of $163,500. Her salary had been $15,800pm.

Mothers returning to work should be aware that discrimination on the grounds of their position and status as mothers or by reason of them having taken maternity leave, is unlawful. The discrimination can also be indirect and unintentional. Nevertheless such conduct by the employer will be unlawful if it places employees in that protected category in a less favourable position than the one they would have been in but for their sex or status.

Russell Bennett

Partner | Email

Disclaimer: This publication is general in nature and is not intended to constitute legal advice. You should seek professional advice before taking any action in relation to the matters dealt with in this publication.

This article first appeared in Playtimes in February 2006. It is reproduced with permission.